English Polish
Akademia Morska w Szczecinie

DSpace Home

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Title
Selected issues regarding achievements in component importance analysis for complex technical systems

ISSN printed: 1733-8670, ISSN on-line: 2392-0378
Chybowski, Leszek1; Gawdzińska, Katarzyna2
URI: https://repository.am.szczecin.pl/handle/123456789/2431
2017-12-15
Selected issues of component importance analysis for complex technical systems have been presented in this paper. A generic example of a complex technical system and selected statistics of operating losses have been described. A description and diagrams of both qualitative and quantitative importance analysis have also been included. The most significant problems facing complex technical system modelling have been pointed out. A multi-criteria system component importance analysis and the basic criteria for a system component quality evaluation have also been introduced. Some factors influencing the importance of the technical system’s components have also been described. Finally, the necessity of further developing importance analysis methods for machinery operation has been highlighted.
  1. Andrews, J.D. (2008) Birnbaum and criticality measures of component contribution to the failure of phased missions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93, pp. 1861– 1966.,
  2. Bajkowski, J.M. & Zalewski, R. (2014) Transient response analysis of a steel beam with vacuum packed particles. Mechanics Research Communications 60, pp. 1–6.,
  3. Belton, V. & Gear, T. (1983) On a short-coming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11, pp. 228–230.,
  4. Belton, V. (1986) A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multi-attribute value function. European Journal of Operational Research 26, pp. 7–21.,
  5. Belton, V. & Goodwin, P. (1996) Remarks on the application of the analytic hierarchy process to judgmental forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting 12, pp. 155–161.,
  6. Borgonovo, E. & Apostolakis, G.E. (2001) A New importance measure for risk-informed decision making. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 72, pp. 193–212.,
  7. Borgonovo, E., Apostolakis, G.E., Tarantola, S. & Saltelli, A. (2003) Comparison of global sensitivity analysis techniques and importance measures in PSA. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 79, pp. 175–185.,
  8. Chang, T.-C. & Wang, H. (2016) A self-testing cloud model for multi-criteria group decision making. Engineering Computations 33, 6, pp. 1767–1783.,
  9. Cebeci, U. & Ruan, D. (2007) A multi-attribute comparison of Turkish quality consultants by fuzzy AHP. Int. J. Info. Tech. Dec. Mak. 06, 01, pp. 191–207.,
  10. Chybowski, L. (2004) Szacowanie niegotowości wybranych systemów siłowni okrętowej obiektów pływających specjalnego przeznaczenia. Materiały XXV Sympozjum Siłowni Okrętowych SymSO 2004. WOiO Politechnika Gdańska, Gdańsk, pp. 5–18.,
  11. Chybowski, L. (2009) Application of External Events Vectors for Defining Reliability Structure of Fishing Vessels power, Propulsion and Technological Plant. PJoES 18, 2A, pp. 45–50.,
  12. Chybowski, L. (2012) Example of Comprehensive Qualitative- Quantitative Reliability Importance Analysis of Complex Technical Systems on a Marine Propulsion Plant. IARS 2012, Symposium Proceedings, Reliasoft Corporation, Warszawa, book session 7/track 2 + CD ROM.,
  13. Chybowski, L. (2014) Ważność elementów w strukturze złożonych systemów technicznych. Radom – Szczecin: ITEPIB.,
  14. Chybowski, L. & Gawdzińska, K. (2016a) On the Present State-of-the-Art of a Component Importance Analysis for Complex Technical Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 445, pp. 691–700,
  15. Chybowski, L. & Gawdzińska, K. (2016b) On the Possibilities of Applying the AHP Method to a Multi-criteria Component Importance Analysis of Complex Technical Objects. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 445, pp. 701–710.,
  16. Dehghanian, P. et al. (2012) Critical Component Identification in Reliability Centered Asset Management of Power Distribution Systems Via Fuzzy AHP. IEEE Systems Journal 4, pp. 593–602.,
  17. Derlukiewicz, D., Ptak, M. & Koziołek, S. (2016) Proactive failure prevention by human-machine interface in remote-controlled demolition robots. New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 445, pp. 711–720.,
  18. Downowicz, O., Krause, J., Sikorski, M. & Stachowski, W. (2000) Application of AHP Method for Evaluation and Safety Control of a Complex Technical System. In: Downorowicz O. (Ed.) Wybrane metody ergonomii i nauki o ekspoloatacji. Gdańsk: Politechnika Gdańska, pp. 7–42 (in Polish).,
  19. Dyer, J.S. (1990) Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 36, pp. 249-258.,
  20. Espiritu, J.F., Coit, D.W. & Prakash, U. (2007) Component criticality importance measures for the power industry. Electric Power Systems Research 77, pp. 407–420.,
  21. Gawdzińska, K., Chybowski, L. & Przetakiewicz, W. (2015) Proper matrix-reinforcement bonding in cast metal matrix composites as a factor of their good quality. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 16(3), pp. 553–563,
  22. Gawdzińska, K., Chybowski, L., Bejger, A. & Krile, S. (2016) Determination of technological parameters of saturated composites based on sic by means of a model liquid. Metalurgija 55, 4, pp. 659–662.,
  23. Goerlandt, F. & Montewka, J. (2014) Review of risk concepts and perspectives in risk assessment of maritime transportation. Proceedings of The European Safety And Reliability Conference (ESREL), Wrocław, pp. 1547- –1554.,
  24. Gomes, H.M. & Awruch, A.M. (2002) Reliability of reinforced concrete structures using stochastic finite elements. Engineering Computations 19, 7, pp. 764–786.,
  25. Grzebieniak, R. & Chybowski, L. (2005) Testy diagnostyczne, grafy wiązań i równania stanu jako narzędzia oceny stanu technicznego urządzeń. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie 5 (77), pp. 247–255.,
  26. Grzebieniak, R. & Chybowski, L. (2006a) Wykorzystanie testów diagnostycznych zbudowanych metodą macierzy booleowskich do oceny stanu technicznego systemu smarowania silnika głównego. Zeszyty Niezawodność i Efektywność Systemów Technicznych. KGTU, Kaliningrad, pp. 79–85.,
  27. Grzebieniak, R. & Chybowski, L. (2006b) Opis wybranego systemu siłowni okrętowej grafami wiązań. Zeszyty Niezawodność i Efektywność Systemów Technicznych. KGTU, Kaliningrad, pp. 86-90.,
  28. Karanta, I. (2011) Importance measures for the dynamic flowgraph methodology. CHARISMA Project. Research report VTT-R-00525-11, Helsinki.,
  29. Kolman, R. (1994) Sterowanie jakością wytwarzania. Gdańsk: Politechnika Gdańska.,
  30. Krile, S. & Kos, M. (2001) A heuristic approach to satellite link capacity planning applied in mobile networks. ITI 2001: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Pula, pp. 331–338.,
  31. Kuo, W. & Zhu, X. (2012) Importance measures in reliability, risk, and optimization. Principles and application. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.,
  32. Ogryczak, W. (2004) Decision making under risk. Monograph course, textbook, Warsaw University.,
  33. Peng, Y. et al (2011) Ensemble of software defect predictors: an AHP-based evaluation method. Int. J. Info. Tech. Dec. Mak. 10, 01, pp. 187–206.,
  34. Pietruszkiewicz, W., Twardochleb, M. & Roszkowski, M. (2011) Hybrid approach to the computational support of decision making in business. Control and Cybernetics 40, 1.,
  35. Ptak, M. & Konarzewski, K. (2015) Numerical Technologies for Vulnerable Road User Safety Enhancement. New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 354, pp. 355–364.,
  36. Rausand, M. & Høyland, A. (2004) System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.,
  37. Rozenberg, L. & Twardochleb, M. (2010) Hybrid optimization approach for effective quasi-optimization solutions. Methods of Optimisation and Data Analysis. University of Szczecin, Faculty of Economics and Management, Szczecin, pp. 31–43.,
  38. Saaty, T.L. (1990) How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 48, pp. 9–26.,
  39. Saaty, T.L. (1994) Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.,
  40. Sun, Y. et al. (2008) Safety risk identification and assessment for Beijing Olympic venues construction. Journal of Management in Engineering 24(1), pp. 40–47.,
  41. RELIASOFT (2007) System Analysis Reference. System Reliability, Maitainability, Availability, Throughput and Optimization Analysis. Tucson.,
  42. Wiśnicki, B. & Dyrda, A. (2016) Analysis of the Intermodal Transport Efficiency in the Central and Eastern Europe. OUR SEA: International Journal of Maritime Science & Technology 63, pp. 43–47.,
  43. Woropay, M. (1983) Metoda budowy wielopoziomowych systemów do badania niezawodności z elementów o wyznaczonej a piori istotności. Rozprawy nr 18. Bydgoszcz: ATR.,
  44. Zalewski, R. & Szmidt, T. (2014) Application of Special Granular Structures for semi-active damping of lateral beam vibrations. Engineering Structures 65, pp. 13–20.,
  45. Zanoli, S.M., Astolfi, G.J. & Marczyk, J. (2012) Complexity- based methodology for Fault Diagnosis: application on a centrifugal machine. Analysis and Control of Chaotic Systems 3, Part 1. Cancún.,
  46. Ziemba, S., Jarominek, W. & Staniszewski, R. (1980) Problemy teorii systemów. Wrocław: Ossolineum,
  47. Żółkiewski, S. (2010) Dynamic Flexibility of Complex Damped Systems Vibrating Transversally in Transportation. Solid State Phenomena 164, pp. 339–342.,
  48. Żółkiewski, S. (2011) Damped Vibrations Problem of Beams Fixed on the Rotational Disk. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 21, 10, pp. 3033–3041.,
  49. Żurek, J., Zieja, M. & Smalko, Z. (2010) The Reliability Estimation of Structural Components with Some Selected Failure Model. PSAM11 & ESREL, Helsinki,

Title

Selected issues regarding achievements in component importance analysis for complex technical systems

Pages

137‒144

Figures

2

Tables

1

ISSN printed

1733-8670

ISSN on-line

2392-0378

DOI

10.17402/255

Type

Review article

Journal

52 Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, no. 52 / 2017

Publisher

Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademia Morska w Szczecinie

Copyright Holder

Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademia Morska w Szczecinie

Published

2017-12-15

Recieved

2017-10-20

Accepted

2017-12-04

Funding

No data

Keywords

importance analysis, complex system, human-machine interfaces, machinery, quality criteria, multi-criteria analysis

URI:

https://repository.am.szczecin.pl/handle/123456789/2431

Language

English

Authors

Chybowski, Leszek1; Gawdzińska, Katarzyna2

Affiliation

1 Maritime University of Szczecin, Faculty of Marine Engineering 1-2 Wały Chrobrego St., 70-500 Szczecin, Poland, l.chybowski@am.szczecin.pl
2 Maritime University of Szczecin, Faculty of Marine Engineering 1-2 Wały Chrobrego St., 70-500 Szczecin, Poland, k.gawdzinska@am.szczecin.pl

Show full item record

Files in this item

Download paper in PDF format
Name: 16-zn-am-52-124-c...
Size: 669.02 KB
Format: PDF
Licence: CC BY
Download

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search repository

Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

RSS Feeds

XML

Cite