English Polski
Akademia Morska w Szczecinie

DSpace Home

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

Author Chybowski, Leszek
Affiliation Maritime University of Szczecin, Faculty of Marine Engineering 1-2 Wały Chrobrego St., 70-500 Szczecin, Poland
E-mail l.chybowski@am.szczecin.pl
Author Gawdzińska, Katarzyna
Affiliation Maritime University of Szczecin, Faculty of Marine Engineering 1-2 Wały Chrobrego St., 70-500 Szczecin, Poland
E-mail k.gawdzinska@am.szczecin.pl
ISSN printed 1733-8670
URI https://repository.am.szczecin.pl/handle/123456789/2417
Abstract The paper presents the application of cost-based, component-importance measures for complex technical systems. A stern tube sealing system installed on a sea vessel was used as an example of a complex technical system. Selected statistics of a ship’s operation losses were calculated. Selected, known-importance measures were presented and the authors’ own approach to cost-based, component-importance analysis was shown. The following measures were discussed: the operation-interruption cost index, the maintenance potential, the simulation- based maintenance index, and maintenance and operational costs. A description of factors influencing the importance of the technical system components was provided.
Pages 59–65
Publisher Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademia Morska w Szczecinie
Keywords marine system
Keywords computer simulation
Keywords importance analysis
Keywords complex system
Keywords sensitivity analysis
Keywords economic aspects
Title Economic aspects of component importance analysis for complex marine systems
Type Original scientific article
References
  1. Bajkowski, J.M. & Zalewski, R. (2014) Transient response analysis of a steel beam with vacuum packed particles. Mechanics Research Communications 60, pp. 1–6.
  2. Chybowski, L. (2014) Ważność komponentów w strukturze złożonych systemów technicznych. Szczecin, Radom: ITE.
  3. Chybowski, L. & Gawdzińska, K. (2016) On the Present State-of-the-Art of a Component Importance Analysis for Complex Technical Systems. In: A. Rocha et al. (eds.) New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 445, pp. 691–700, Springer, Cham.
  4. Chybowski, L., Laskowski, R. & Gawdzińska, K. (2015) An overview of systems supplying water into the combustion chamber of diesel engines to decrease the amount of nitrogen oxides in exhaust gas. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 20, 3, pp. 393–405.
  5. Chybowski, L. & Żółkiewski, S. (2016) Basic reliability structures of complex technical systems. In: A. Rocha et al. (eds.) New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 354, pp. 333–342, Springer, Cham.
  6. Derlukiewicz, D., Ptak, M. & Koziołek, S. (2016) Proactive failure prevention by human-machine interface in remote- controlled demolition robots. In: A. Rocha et al. (eds.) New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 445, pp. 711–720, Springer, Cham.
  7. Duda-Gwiazda, J. (1995) Niezawodność okrętowych siłowni spalinowych. Raport techniczny Nr RT-95/T-01. Gdańsk: Centrum Techniki Okrętowej.
  8. Hilber, P. (2005) Component reliability importance indices for maintenance optimization of electrical networks. Licentiate thesis. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
  9. Hilber, P. & Bertling, L. (2004) Monetary Importance of Component Reliability in Electrical Networks for Maintenance Optimization. Proceedings of Probability Methods Applied to Power Systems, Ames, Iowa, September 2004.
  10. Hyundai Heavy Industries (2003) Specifications for 6,500 TEU class container carrier. Ulsan: Hyundai Heavy Industries.
  11. Karanta, I. (2011) Importance measures for the dynamic flow graph methodology. CHARISMA Project. Research report VTT-R-00525-11. VTT, Helsinki.
  12. Kuo, W. & Zhu, X. (2012) Importance measures in reliability, risk, and optimization. Princples and application. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  13. Paska, J. (2013) Wybrane aspekty optymalizacji niezawodności systemu elektroenergetycznego. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność 12, 2, pp. 202–208.
  14. Ptak, M. & Konarzewski, K. (2015) Numerical Technologies for Vulnerable Road User Safety Enhancement. In: A. Rocha et al. (eds.) New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 354, pp. 355–364.
  15. ReliaSoft (2007) System Analysis Reference. Reliability, Availability & Optimization. Tuscon, Arizona, USA: Reliasoft Publishing. [Online] 2012, Available from: http:// reliawiki.com/index.php/System_Analysis_Reference [Accessed: July 18, 2017]
  16. Woropay, M. (1983) Metoda budowy wielopoziomowych systemów do badania niezawodności z komponentów o wyznaczonej a piori istotności. Rozprawy nr 18. Bydgoszcz: ATR.
  17. Zalewski, R. & Szmidt, T. (2014) Application of Special Granular Structures for semi-active damping of later
ISSN on-line 2392-0378
Language English
Funding No data
Figures 4
Tables 3
DOI 10.17402/231
Published 2017-09-27
Accepted 2017-08-04
Recieved 2017-07-19


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search repository

Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

RSS Feeds