English Polish
Politechnika Morska w Szczecinie

DSpace Home

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

Author Mink, Michael
Affiliation Airbus Defence and Space 1 Willy-Messerschmitt-Straße, 85521 Ottobrunn, Germany
E-mail Michael.Mink@airbus.com
Author Heck, Bernhard
Affiliation Karlsruhe Institute of Technology 7 Englerstraße, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
E-mail Bernhard.Heck@kit.edu
ISSN printed 1733-8670
URI https://repository.am.szczecin.pl/handle/123456789/1160
Abstract Although integrity concepts for Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are ubiquitous in the aviation community, integrity algorithms of comparable maturity have not yet been developed for maritime users. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) specifies requirements different from those specified by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). These different requirements affect the design of the integrity algorithms with respect to integrity risk allocation and threat space. This paper describes a novel integrity algorithm based on conditions valid for maritime users. The performance of the novel integrity algorithm has been assessed and compared to a conventional Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) approach consistent with IMO requirements.
Pages 155-161
Publisher Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademia Morska w Szczecinie
Keywords maritime
Keywords Global Navigation Satellite Systems
Keywords integrity
Keywords Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring
Keywords International Maritime Organization
Keywords protection level
Title Performance of a novel Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring procedure consistent with IMO requirements
Type Original scientific article
References
  1. BROWN, G. (1992) A Baseline RAIM Scheme and a Note on the equivalence of the three RAIM methods. Navigation. 39. pp. 301–316.
  2. EGM08 (2008) Spherical Harmonic Coefficients of EGM08. [Online] Available from: http://earthinfo.nga.mil/ GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008. [Accessed: 24th March 2015]
  3. Global Positioning System (2008) SPS Performance Standard for GPS.
  4. HAMMER, J. & DAVID, E. (2010) Stochastic Analysis of ADS-B Integrity Requirements. The MITRE Corporation, Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2010 IEEE/AIAA 29th, 3–7 Oct. 2010.
  5. IMO (2002) IMO Resolution A.915(22) – Revised Maritime Policy and Requirements for a Future Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), 22.01.2002.
  6. ISSHIKI, H. (2008) A New Method for Detection, Identification and Mitigation of Outliers in Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM). ION GNSS 21st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division, 16–19. September 2008, Savannah, GA.
  7. MAAST (2014) Matlab Algorithm Availability Simulation Tool [Online] Available from: http://waas.stanford.edu/ staff/maast/maast.html. [Accessed: 22nd October 2014]
  8. Navipedia (2014) European Space Agency. [Online] Available from: http://navipedia.org/. [Accessed: 6th October 2014]
  9. RTCA/DO 229D (2006) Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Global Positioning Systems / Wide Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. RTCA, Inc., Washington D.C., USA.
  10. STURZA, M.A. (1988–1989) Navigation System Integrity Monitoring Using Redundant Measurements, Navigation. Journal of the Institute of Navigation. 35. 4. pp. 483–501.
ISSN on-line 2392-0378
Language English
Funding No data
Figures 7
Tables 3
DOI 10.17402/071
Published 2015-12-10
Accepted 2015-11-11
Recieved 2015-10-16


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search repository

Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

RSS Feeds