English Polski
Akademia Morska w Szczecinie

DSpace Home

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

Author Sevgili, Coşkan
Affiliation Dokuz Eylül University, Maritime Faculty Department of Maritime Transportation Engineering 35160 Buca-Izmir, Turkey
E-mail coskansevgili@gmail.com
Author Zorba, Yusuf
Affiliation Dokuz Eylül University, Maritime Faculty Department of Maritime Transportation Engineering 35160 Buca-Izmir, Turkey
E-mail yusuf.zorba@deu.edu.tr
ISSN printed 1733-8670
URI http://repository.am.szczecin.pl/handle/123456789/2484
Abstract Bunkering is very important for the maritime industry because of the need for continuity of trade, its relation to the energy industry and its great economic value. Today, the volume of the world’s bunkering market is around 350 million tons annually. Although there are about 400 major bunkering ports in the world, most of the demand is concentrated in a few strategic ports: when comparing strategic regions of the world, Istanbul has a very small share. With this in mind, this paper aims to demonstrate the current situation of Istanbul and to improve service quality using Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment. Our results show that the criteria which customers look for, in order of importance, are: supply waiting time; bunker quality; usage and availability of barges; duration of bunkering operation; and bunker price and price competitiveness. The steps to be taken to improve service quality are determined as: increase storage facilities and capacities; create a structure that can provide 24/7 bunker supply; and increase importance of bunkering in port infrastructure and management thinking (bunker port concept). It is possible that the findings can be a guide to ship fuel suppliers, especially in Turkey, to improve service quality and increase their fuel sales volume.
Pages 19–27
Publisher Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademia Morska w Szczecinie
Keywords fuzzy logic
Keywords bunkering
Keywords Quality Function Deployment
Keywords service quality
Keywords ship fuels
Keywords ship operations
Title An application of Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment to bunkering services
  1. Acosta, M., Coronado, D. & Cerban, M.D.M. (2011) Bunkering competition and competitiveness at the ports of the Gibraltar Strait. Journal of Transport Geography 19, 4, pp. 911–916. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.11.008.
  2. Akao, Y. (1990) Quality Function Deployment Integrating Customer Requirement into Product Design. Cambridge: Productivity Press.
  3. Akbaba, A. (2005) The quality function deployment (QFD) approach in customer focused service production: an application study for hospitality industry. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırma Dergisi 1, 1, pp. 59–81 (in Turkish).
  4. Akman, G. & Özcan, B. (2011) A fuzzy quality function deployment (QFD) approach to determine customer needs for driving mirror. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 10, 19, pp. 1–21.
  5. Boutsikas, A. (2003) The bunkering industry and its effect on shipping tanker operations. MSc Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
  6. Çelikyilmaz, A. & Türkşen, I.B. (2009) Modeling Uncertainty with Fuzzy Logic with Recent Theory and Applications. Berlin: Springer.
  7. Chan, L.K. & Wu, M.L. (2002) Quality Function Deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 143, 3, pp. 463–497. doi: 10.1016/S0377- 2217(02)00178-9.
  8. Chang, Y.C. & Chen, C.C. (2006) Knowledge-based simulation of bunkering services in the Port of Kaohsiung. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 23, 1, pp. 21–34. doi: 10.1080/10286600600585625.
  9. Cohen, L. (1995) Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.
  10. Draffin, N. (2008) Introduction to Bunkering. Oxford: Petrospot.
  11. Draffin, N. (2010) Introduction to Bunker Operations. Oxford: Petrospot
  12. Draffin, N. (2011) Commercial Practise in Bunkering. Oxford: Petrospot
  13. DTO (2015) Gemi ikmal hizmetleri. [Online] Available from: http://www.denizticaretodasi.org.tr/Shared%20Documents/ Deniz%20Ticareti%20Dergisi/eksayi_subat_15.pdf. [Accessed: February 12, 2017].
  14. Dupre, A. (2010) An Introduction to Bunker Credit Risk. Oxford: Petrospot
  15. Ficalora, J.P. & Cohen, L. (2009) Quality Function Deployment and Six Sigma: A QFD Handbook. Indiana: Prentice Hall.
  16. Jang, J.S.R., Sun, T.C. & Mizutani, E. (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and Soft Computing: A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  17. Lam, J.S.L., Chen, D., Cheng, F. & Wong, K. (2011) Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs: Empirical studies on Singapore and Shanghai. Transportation Journal 50, 2, pp. 176–203. doi: 10.5325/transportationj. 50.2.0176.
  18. MPA (2017) Singapore’s 2016 maritime performance. [Online] Available from: http://www.mpa.gov.sg/web/portal/ home/media-centre/news-releases/detail/05460688-fe49- 42e7-9740-4ce88b157b46. [Accessed: 18th June 2017]
  19. OPEC (2015) World Oil Outlook 2015. [Online] Available from: http://www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/ media/downloads/publications/WOO%202015.pdf. [Accessed: April 06, 2017]
  20. Port of Rotterdam (2017) Fewer bunkers in Rotterdam in 2016. [Online] Available from: https://www.portofrotterdam. com/en/news-and-press-releases/fewer-bunkers-in-rotterdam- in-2016. [Accessed: June 17, 2017]
  21. Van Leekwijck, W. & Kerre, E.E. (1999) Defuzzification: criteria and classification. Fuzzy sets and systems 108, 2, pp. 159–178.
  22. Vilhelmsen, C., Lusby, R.M. & Larsen, J. (2013) Routing and scheduling in tramp shipping-integrating bunker optimization: Technical report. Copenhagen: Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
  23. Wang, Y., Yeo, G.T. & Ng, A.K. (2014) Choosing optimal bunkering ports for liner shipping companies: A hybrid Fuzzy-Delphi–TOPSIS approach. Transport Policy 35, pp. 358–365. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.04.009.
  24. Yao, Z., Ng, S.H. & Lee, L.H. (2012) A Study on bunker fuel management for the shipping liner services. Computers & Operations Research 39, 5, pp. 1160–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.07.012.
ISSN on-line 2392-0378
Language English
Funding No data
Figures 2
Tables 4
DOI 10.17402/281
Published 2018-06-27
Accepted 2018-04-11
Recieved 2018-02-27

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search repository

Advanced Search


My Account

RSS Feeds